Dating in 19th century america new dating sites information search sites
This page details some problems that arise by accepting the Church-sanctioned teachings of the origin and content of the BOM as well as responses to those problems from the LDS Church, apologists and devout members.An anachronism is when writing contains something from a future time period which couldn't realistically be in the time period they've written it into.The other came much earlier when the Lord confounded the tongues at the Tower of Babel. After thousands of years, all were destroyed except the Lamanites, and they are the principal ancestors of the American Indians." of the BOM say all of the people chronicled in the book were destroyed, except the Lamanites, and they are the principal ancestors of the American Indians." The new introduction reads much the same, but says the Lamanites are among the ancestors of the American Indians causing some debate.Concerning this record the Prophet Joseph Smith said: "I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book." Latter-day Saints are repeatedly encouraged to rely on a witness of the spirit (i.e.
Count the clock," with Cassius replying, "The clock has stricken three." The problem is that the play took place in 44 BC—a time period in which "striking" clocks had not yet been invented.Racism BOM lacks doctrine The Anthon visit Literary value More BOM difficulties Six sources used Response by the Church Ending summary by critics Editor's comments Sunstone BOM debates Links The Book of Mormon is a true record of the inhabitants of the Americas from about 2200 BC to 420 AD.The Book of Mormon may have undergone some minor changes but these consist primarily of spelling or grammatical alterations and don't affect the overall meaning of the text.If it would require more than one anachronism for you to disbelieve, how many such anachronisms would be needed for you to realize the writing was not what it claimed to be?For many apologists, if something is possible, no matter how implausible, that is enough to assuage their concerns.Of even greater concern is that many faithful LDS members, by virtue of the admonition of their leaders (mentioned above), are not even aware of the perplexing problems contained in the Book of Mormon text.As a result, they are usually unable to effectively dialogue with critics without resorting to faith-based claims in a testimony which carry no authoritative weight for the many dedicated experts in the fields of archaeology, history, linguistics, genetics, etc.Holy Ghost) to personally authenticate the truthfulness of the origins and content of the Book of Mormon.Given constant encouragement from general and local leaders of reliance on supernatural manifestations (a testimony) over testable claims, it is not surprising that many faithful Latter-Day Saints seem unfazed by empirical evidence (or the lack of it) contradicting Book of Mormon claims, whether the research is conducted by Mormon or non-Mormon archaeologists and historians.Book of Mormon title page: "Wherefore, it is an abridgment of the record of the people of Nephi, and also of the Lamanites-Written to the Lamanites, who are a remnant of the house of Israel." Book of Mormon introduction: "It is a record of God's dealings with the ancient inhabitants of the Americas and contains the fullness of the everlasting gospel.The record gives an account of two great civilizations. C., and afterward separated into two nations, known as the Nephites and the Lamanites.